18/06/2026
We gave this codebase a D.
Our technical health score runs A to F.
A = launch-ready with minor optimisations.
D = significant structural or security problems requiring immediate attention.
F = do not launch.
A D-rated codebase isn't broken on the surface.
The app runs.
Users can log in.
Demos look fine.
But underneath:
→ Architecture that fails at scale
→ Security gaps that expose user data
→ No test coverage — every update is a gamble
→ No documentation — the next developer starts from zero
→ Deprecated dependencies with known vulnerabilities
A D today becomes an F after the next marketing push.
We've audited 60+ Australian codebases.
Most of them score between C and D on first review.
None of the founders knew.
That's the point of the audit.
DM us AUDIT , free 48-hour code review. Written report. A–F health score. NDA before you share anything.
You deserve to know where your codebase actually stands.