The Webb

The Webb We are a software solution for large datasets and investigations

09/18/2026

Back when the Alphabet Boys told the American Public some of what they did.

You can investigate the MASSIVE FBI dataset at thewebb.io

Did the FBI investigate Albert Einstein? Find out yourself at thewebb.io.
09/17/2026

Did the FBI investigate Albert Einstein?

Find out yourself at thewebb.io.

09/16/2026

You can investigate COINTELPRO in the FBI Files in Webb and see how they shaped this country with the covert program.

thewebb.io

09/15/2026

Go beyond the headline. That’s the whole idea behind Webb, and this is what it actually looks like to use it.

You’ve been trained to stop at the summary. A headline tells you what happened, a pundit tells you what it means, and that’s usually where it ends because going to the actual documents was slow, tedious, and mostly impossible for anyone without a research team. Webb removes that ceiling. You ask a question in plain language, and it answers from the primary sources, with a citation you can open and read yourself.

Watch the workflow in the clip. A real question goes in. Webb returns a direct answer and points to the exact document it came from. You open the citation and confirm it with your own eyes. That’s the entire loop, and it changes what “doing your own research” actually means. No more taking someone’s word for it. No more wondering whether a summary left out the part that mattered. The source is right there, one click away.

We used a question about the DOJ’s Epstein review as the example here, but the point isn’t the example. The point is that you can do this with anything. Any dataset, any question, any claim you want to check. The Epstein files, the 9/11 records, the FBI Vault, pharmaceutical litigation, the chemical industry archive, and more, all searchable the same way, all cited to the page.

The files are here. Bring your questions.

Investigate the files yourself at app.thewebb.io.

Comment “Webb” to learn more. New to Webb? Your first month is $5, full access to every dataset.

thewebb.io

The Epstein Files has so much information it’s hard to sift through it all yourself. This is why Webb exists. It can ...
09/14/2026

The Epstein Files has so much information it’s hard to sift through it all yourself. This is why Webb exists. It can help you identify the threads you want to pull on and pulls on them with you.

thewebb.io

09/14/2026

Just a reminder that all of the Epstein Files are in Webb.

These files always seem to overlap with everything happening in the world.

thewebb.io

In 2003, 3M drew blood from 38 of its own workers and measured how much of a “forever chemical” was circulating in their...
09/13/2026

In 2003, 3M drew blood from 38 of its own workers and measured how much of a “forever chemical” was circulating in their bodies. The company’s own report is a lesson in why a single number can hide the whole story.

Here’s what the document is, stated precisely. A June 17, 2003 3M medical report recorded serum PFOA levels in 38 workers at the Cottage Grove facility. It’s important to be exact about what that means: it measured a chemical in blood. It did not, on its own, establish any individual worker’s health outcome. This is employee biomonitoring, not a diagnosis.

Now the part worth reading closely. The reported serum PFOA concentrations ranged from 0.070 to 32.6 ppm. The arithmetic mean was 4.325 ppm. But because the data were skewed, the median told a different story: 1.6 ppm. When the average is more than double the median, it means a smaller number of very high readings are pulling the average up, and most workers sat well below that headline figure while some sat far above it.

That gap between mean and median is the whole point. If someone quotes you “the average was 4.325 ppm,” they’ve technically told the truth and functionally hidden the range. One person in that group carried 32.6 ppm. Another carried 0.070. A single average erases both of them.

This is exactly why primary sources matter and why context travels with the number. Before anyone compares these figures to another study, you have to read the sample size, the units, and the collection dates, all of which are in the original document. Webb holds the Chemical Industry Archive, with the original 3M report searchable and cited to the exact page. Read the range, not just the average.

Comment “Webb” to learn more. New to Webb? Your first month is $5, full access to every dataset.

thewebb.io

Two of the 9/11 hijackers were known to the CIA more than a year and a half before the attacks. They had U.S. visas. The...
09/11/2026

Two of the 9/11 hijackers were known to the CIA more than a year and a half before the attacks. They had U.S. visas. They flew into the country. And the moment to put them on a watchlist kept passing.

This is the CIA director’s own written statement to investigators, in the record.

In early January 2000, U.S. officials obtained a photocopy of Khalid al-Mihdhar’s passport as he traveled to a meeting in Kuala Lumpur. It showed a valid U.S. multiple-entry visa. Officers, per the director’s statement, had enough detail to watchlist him. They did not nominate him. The stated reason was that the level of detail needed to formally nominate him for refusal or watchlisting wasn’t pursued, because the focus remained on the surveillance operation.

March 2000: the CIA learned that Nawaf al-Hazmi had flown to Los Angeles that January. The director’s statement acknowledges that this information should have triggered watchlisting. That opportunity was missed too.

August 23, 2001: nineteen days before the attacks, the CIA finally requested that both al-Mihdhar and al-Hazmi be watchlisted.

Read the sequence and state it fairly, which is exactly what the document does. The statement acknowledges missed opportunities. It does not say officers knew the specific attack plan. What it lays out is a chronology of chances to flag two men who were already inside the country, chances that came in January 2000, in March 2000, and only converted to action nineteen days before September 11.

Webb holds the 9/11 FOIA and Government Records Archive, 40,300 documents and 189,100 pages, alongside the newly added Mamdani portal of 24,400 documents. The director’s written statement, the watchlisting chronology, the travel records, all searchable on one canvas, every finding cited to the exact page.

Comment “Webb” to learn more. New to Webb? Your first month is $5, full access to every dataset.

thewebb.io

New York City built an emergency command center specifically for disasters. On 9/11, it was located inside 7 World Trade...
09/11/2026

New York City built an emergency command center specifically for disasters. On 9/11, it was located inside 7 World Trade Center. When the towers were hit, the command post for the entire city response had to be evacuated and rebuilt on the fly. You can now read the plan and the collapse of that plan side by side.

This is what happens when you put two datasets on one canvas.

From the Mamdani records, New York City’s newly released September 11th Document Portal: a March 1998 city memo laying out the plan. It describes a new Emergency Operations Center and 24-hour Watch Command, with executive staff, a Mayor’s suite, radio rooms, and full support facilities, all to be built on the 23rd floor of Building 7. On paper, it was the nerve center for exactly this kind of emergency.

From the 9/11 FOIA and Government Records Archive: the response. A summary of Richard Sheirer’s interview describes the reality on the day. The order was given to evacuate 7 WTC after a report of additional planes inbound. The purpose-built command center was abandoned. In its place, an OEM bus at West Broadway and Barclay became the improvised command post for the city’s response.

The plan and the improvisation, in two separate document collections, describing the same room from opposite ends. One says here is where we will run the emergency. The other says here is what we did when that room was gone. Neither tells the whole story alone. Together, they do.

That is the entire idea behind Webb. Load both 9/11 datasets, 24,400 documents from the Mamdani portal and 40,300 from the FOIA archive, and search them as one investigation. Every result cited to the exact page. Compare documents, dates, and sources without switching tabs or trusting a summary.

Comment “Webb” to learn more. New to Webb? Your first month is $5, full access to every dataset.

thewebb.io

In the days before 9/11, someone placed an unusual number of bets that two specific airlines were about to crash. Then t...
09/11/2026

In the days before 9/11, someone placed an unusual number of bets that two specific airlines were about to crash. Then the planes those airlines flew were used in the attacks. That’s not a rumor. It’s a question the 9/11 Commission put in the record.

The pattern was specific enough that it triggered a federal inquiry. In the days before the attacks, there was a spike in “put” options on United Airlines and American Airlines, essentially wagers that the stocks would fall. The Commission traced roughly 95% of one day’s United put purchases to a single U.S. institutional investor. The American Airlines activity drew scrutiny too, with unusual volume the investigation worked to explain.

Here’s where the official story lands, and it matters that we state it accurately: the Commission reported it found no connection to the attacks. The investigation concluded the trades had innocent explanations, and that those who placed them had no advance knowledge of 9/11. According to the record, one strategy also involved buying 115,000 American Airlines shares on September 10, a bet the stock would rise, which investigators read as evidence against foreknowledge.

So the record contains both things at once: a genuinely strange trading pattern that alarmed federal investigators, and an official conclusion that it meant nothing. The value isn’t in picking a side from a headline. It’s in reading what the SEC and the Commission actually documented, the interviews, the numbers, the reasoning, and deciding for yourself whether the explanation fits the anomaly.

And there’s more to read now than ever. Webb just added the newly released Mamdani 9/11 records, New York City’s September 11th Document Portal, published by the city’s Law Department for the 25th anniversary this month: 24,400 documents and 173,000 pages. That sits alongside the existing 9/11 FOIA archive of 40,300 documents and 189,100 pages, all searchable together on one canvas, every result cited to the exact page.

Comment “Webb” to learn more. New to Webb? Your first month is $5, full access to every dataset.

thewebb.io

Address

Waco, TX
76700-76799

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Webb posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category