Singula team

07/16/2026

It was a great experience to take part in this project! Interesting challenges, smooth teamwork, and the opportunity to fully apply our expertise – this is exactly the kind of work that helps us grow and improve.

We're proud to have been part of this journey and are already looking forward to the next challenges ahead. There's still plenty of work to do, and we're full of energy!

The most expensive mistake in infrastructure projects is starting to choose tools too early.

We have an interesting case. The client is a top-tier research laboratory – we can't disclose the name due to NDA. Their pain point: despite having a powerful pool of professional GPUs, engineers were wasting time waiting. Graphics cards were being reserved entirely even for small tasks, resource allocation between teams was done manually, and expensive equipment sat idle.

We didn't jump straight into designing the future platform's architecture. Instead, we started with experiments: we tested different GPU scheduling approaches on the client's real workloads. This helped us understand which solution would actually fit their infrastructure.

Based on the data we gathered, we built a unified MLOps platform that automated compute resource allocation, pooled existing GPUs, and made their usage transparent for the entire team.

As a result, engineers could run tasks in parallel without waiting for access to compute resources, and management got full visibility into infrastructure utilization.

Good architecture doesn't start with tool selection. It starts with understanding the problem.

Read more about the project on Evrone's website: https://evrone.com/cases/relab

06/25/2026

The article breaks down when Rust actually solves real business problems, and when migration is just an expensive undertaking with no tangible payoff. Take a look – maybe your case is right there.

Something interesting has happened with Rust.

Just a few years ago, people were mostly arguing about it. Some said it was the future of development, others thought it was just another overhyped trend.

Now there's less arguing. But there are a lot more practical questions. For example, whether it's worth migrating an existing product to Rust.

And this is usually where it turns out that the question isn't really about the language at all.

Because there's a golden rule: if it ain't broke, don't fix it. If the system is well-tuned, the team is happy, and business goals are being met – migration can end up being an expensive endeavor with little noticeable return. But if you've accumulated issues with performance, security, or maintaining legacy code – that's a whole different conversation.

In an article with Evrone's DevRel Grigory Petrov, we broke down the situations where switching to Rust might actually be justified. And a few cases where it's better not to redo something that's already working just fine.

https://evrone.com/blog/migrating-to-rust-in-2025

06/18/2026

An interesting example of how a seemingly simple redesign can actually involve a deep architectural overhaul. In this project, the frontend had become a bottleneck for further development of a complex marketing platform. We were fortunate to be involved in the process of updating key user scenarios and internal logic. The result is a cleaner, more intuitive interface with room for the product to keep growing.

Redesign isn't always about a new look. Often, as a product grows, there comes a point where updating the interface alone is no longer enough.

That's exactly what Mindbox ran into during their platform modernization. It's a cloud service for marketing automation – email campaigns, personalization, loyalty programs, plus customer data management without overloading the client's internal IT systems. The product is complex, and its frontend had become a bottleneck for further development.

Together with the client's team, Evrone developers took part in updating the frontend architecture and reworking key user scenarios. As a result, reports became much more convenient, working with data became clearer, and setting up recommendations became simpler.

At the same time, the most important changes weren't happening on the screen. Behind an interface that looks simple and intuitive to the user, there's usually a significant amount of work on architecture, product logic, and internal processes. It's these kinds of changes that allow a product to keep growing without constantly becoming more complicated.

More about the project:
https://evrone.com/cases/mindbox

06/04/2026

When a business has grown but engineering processes remain at the level of manual management, this becomes a bottleneck. Open access, billing setup taking an hour and a half, one shared test environment for everyone – these don't just slow down development; they create direct risks for a product that is already generating revenue.

We encountered this situation with the JobHire.АI project. The platform processes more than a million job listings per month, but the infrastructure required a complete rebuild: security, automation, observability.

Our team closed external access to servers, automated test environment deployment, and moved billing to scripts – setup time dropped from two hours to five minutes. QA stopped depending on a single shared environment, and developers gained stable conditions for experimentation.

We don't write code for the client. We enable their own team to work faster, more securely, and without fear of making mistakes. That is our expertise.

More details about this case study can be found on our website: https://singula.team/cases/jobhireai

05/28/2026

Which Go framework should you actually pick for a real project? This breakdown compares the most popular options and explains when a framework saves you and when it just gets in the way.

05/14/2026

What do you think – in which cases should you migrate from Ruby to Go? And should you do it at all? An interesting article analyzing all the pros and cons has been published by our colleagues. The link is in the post. Read it and let's discuss.

Migrating from Ruby to Go: when it makes sense and when it's a mistake

A Ruby project worked steadily for years, but then the load grew, response time increased, new features became a struggle, and everyone around started saying: "Switch to Go."

Is it worth abandoning your familiar stack? Let's explore this together with Alexander Kirillov, a DevOps expert and mentor in the Evrone DevOps internship program.

Go is faster under load because it compiles to machine code. Built-in goroutines simplify parallel computing. Static typing catches errors at compile time. The final binary is easy to deploy.

But there are trade-offs. The Ruby ecosystem is richer – many things in Go would have to be written from scratch. The language has strict rules: even an unused variable will prevent compilation. There are no classes or inheritance – only structs and interfaces.
Migrating a large project takes months, plus retraining the team.

To make the right decision, assess your actual problems. If current performance is no longer satisfactory – Go might help. If everything runs fine, the switch may not be worth the effort. Start by rewriting one microservice in Go, not the entire project.

And if you want to try Go but find it daunting, we can help with migration – from a test prototype to a full project rewrite.

All the details – which approach to choose, how to test, and whether to start at all – are in the article.
https://evrone.com/blog/from-ruby-to-go

05/07/2026

We want to tell you about an interesting project that we were also involved in.

04/23/2026

When we worked together on this project, the main challenge wasn't in the code. It was in making sure the HR system didn't just function, but actually addressed the needs of a growing company. Spoiler: it worked out. Details inside.

04/09/2026

We are sharing an interesting project we took part in.

Need help scaling your EdTech platform? Here's how we tackled this challenge. You can reach out to Evrone with a similar challenge: [email protected]

We at Evrone are used to complex projects, but Kinderlime is a different story.

It’s an app for private daycare centers and preschools in the US. It handles all the administrative work: contactless check-in and check-out, payment collection, staff management, and enrichment programs. In short, everything that helps educators focus on the children instead of paperwork. The service is popular – more than 30,000 centers use it.

The client came to us with an existing Rails application. But the business was growing, the feature set was expanding, and the monolith was starting to slow things down. The goal was to separate the frontend and backend via a REST API and build a new frontend based on ready‑made mockups.

Here’s what we did. We wrote a library on top of Redux and Axios that generates API requests, reducers, and response handling. Without it, we would have had to write the same code hundreds of times. We also built a custom form builder from scratch: support for custom questions, multi‑step forms, and custom fields. We added a CRM with dashboards that collect all conversion analytics. We built an email builder as well – custom campaigns, mailing list management, automated notifications to parents of enrolled children – all while ensuring correct rendering in Outlook, Apple Mail, Gmail, and other clients.

On the technical side: React, Redux, Webpack, Stripe integration, CircleCI for continuous integration, AWS for storage, and Cypress for testing – we achieved 90% test coverage.

In the end, Kinderlime didn’t just get a modernized product; they gained transparent communication and an effective engineering team that integrated smoothly with their product team. The new features and interface helped attract even more customers.

EdTech is never easy, especially at the scale of thousands of educational institutions. If you have a similar challenge – reach out, we’re ready to help.
https://evrone.com/cases/kinderlime

03/26/2026

We are happy to share an interesting project we were involved in.