08/03/2026
Model decisions depend on clean data. Still, multilingual evaluations often have hidden noise that looks like a performance signal but is actually just a technical error.
During a recent project for a major AI lab, we evaluated two voice model candidates across 15 languages. Our team spent over 2,000 hours on this. Mid-way through the work, we found incorrect model mappings and confusing instructions inside the testing tool.
If we had ignored those issues, the preference data would have been wrong. The lab would have chosen a model based on a glitch in the interface rather than the actual quality of the AI.
We documented the risks and fixed them while the evaluation was still live, keeping the dataset accurate. The client moved forward with the right model because the data reflected reality.
Message our team to discuss your current evaluation pipeline.