Softec Technologies

Softec Technologies All computer related jobs...computer repair and maintenance. .software installation...servicing...Web designing...All hardwares..networking..consultations.

Scammer alert....using binance id 792649223....phone number +91 80531 80018...stay warned
25/04/2024

Scammer alert....using binance id 792649223....phone number +91 80531 80018...stay warned

19/07/2023
24/05/2023

✨️✨️OFFER OFFER OFFER✨️✨️

*TODAY'S OFFER ON LATEST SECURITY ALL IN ONE PANDORA FILES - MDM/DEAD BOOT/ HANG ON LOGO*

✨️ *MDM FILES*✨️
1. All NOKIA Latest security Pandora files...
+Nokia C01 (1383)
+Nokia C01 (1387)
+Nokia C10
+Nokia C20
+Nokia C21
+Nokia C21 plus
+Nokia C30
+Nokia C31 (22$)
+Nokia G10
+Nokia G20
+Nokia G21... And many Nokia spd and mediatek

2. Samsung A035F U1, U2
3. Samsung A032F U1 and U2
4. Samsung A037F U1 and U2 (25$)
5. Samsung A037F U3 (25$)

Other Samsung isp files available. Enquire from my inbox...

All files cost same price per file, except where stated otherwise. Offer price for today is only 19$.

Place your order now...

26/02/2020
05/07/2019

DDR

Someone just sent me the IEBC database logs that Nasa just said was evidence of tampering. As a DBA, of course it is per...
04/09/2017

Someone just sent me the IEBC database logs that Nasa just said was evidence of tampering. As a DBA, of course it is personally very exciting to be analysing documents of such importance. I haven't finished my analysis, but a few initial findings (brace yourself, this is going to be long, hehe):

- What I see from these logs is a database initializing (starting) and evidence of a database that was not very well tuned. That means the performance would degrade and users and applications connected to it would notice a slowdown in response time. The evidence for this are some performance-related database parameters and messages, eg "08/08/2017 20:12:50,spid1s,Unknown,A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged out. This may result in a performance degradation. Duration: 0 seconds. Working set (KB): 27888". Here the key is 'paging out'. It means the database engine automatically had to write out some data from its own working memory space to the server's hard disk. Why? Because the working memory was full and the db engine needed to clear space for other database activities. This is usually a sign of improper memory allocation in the server, but not really evidence of hacking.

- The IEBC system actually consists of several databases, one for the presidential vote, and (I think) 47 more for the county votes. I deduced this from the database names, eg "Database: IEBC_PRESIDENTIAL2017", "Database IEBC_NAIROBI_COUNTY", "Database IEBC_NYAMIRA_COUNTY". Imo, this splitting up is a good idea so you don't have just one database potentially overloaded with a huge number of read and write operations.

- The Nasa IT guy on TV mentioned that there was a 'master log' that the other hackers could not delete. I guess that's what I am looking at, because it consists of meta-data (data about data) from several other databases. He said the hackers deleted the other individual database logs, but you cannot delete the master logs. Wrong! It is very possible to also delete this master log, it just needs a slightly different process, like first shutting down the database engine. Any competent dba/ hacker would definitely know this.

- I also see some parameters and settings that are very revealing. For example: "08/08/2017 04:10:51,spid53,Unknown,Setting database option
READ_WRITE to ON for database IEBC_NYAMIRA_COUNTY". Translated - the database was previously set to READ-ONLY status, and was only set to READ-WRITE (ability to change data within the db) at around 4:10am on 08.Aug. Imo this is a good idea to ensure nobody can write any data to the db before the election day. Again, imo this is inconsistent with what a hacker would do - ideally to do any mischief you want to give yourself very early read-write access to a db.

- Several other parameters are just random or expected ones when a database is starting.

- Nasa mentioned one specific parameter as more evidence of hacking: CONCAT_NULL_YIELDS_NULL. Setting this parameter to ON means that if you add a value to a null (a 'nothing' in the database), it will result in a null. This would be a good way to, for example, reduce Raila's votes from a certain county. You would do this by adding Raila's tally from that county, eg 100,000 to a 'null', and then using the resulting value (a null or 'nothing') in your calculation towards Raila's total. Clear? Good. So in this way, you would effectively subtract 100,000 votes from Raila, without actually deleting the 100,000 value from the database. And why do it this way? Because many db's are set up so that any deletions from the database will immediately raise an alert or audit issue. So using the CONCAT_NULL_YIELDS_NULL is a nice workaround to avoid raising such an alert. Now, from what I see, there is nowhere in the logs that this parameter has been set to ON. In fact, it has explicitly been set to OFF in all the databases, eg "08/08/2017 04:09:50,spid53,Unknown,Setting database option CONCAT_NULL_YIELDS_NULL to OFF for database IEBC_KISUMU_COUNTY."

- Nasa also mentioned that the hackers logged in to the database as user accounts 'Chebukati' and 'Msando', the sadly murdered IT chief. Both of these statements are not true. What happened is someone(s) TRIED and FAILED to log in, once as user 'msando' and twice as user 'chebukati' (see attached screenshot). Both attempts failed. So why would someone be trying to log in as Msando? Perhaps to confirm that his user account really is deleted, which was exactly what should be done once there was suspicion that the account was compromised. As for 'chebukati', I really don't know why his account was deleted, maybe also a security measure. But again, there could be some good reason for this, and to jump immediately to 'hacking' is just irresponsible.

So in summary: I have looked at the IEBC logs, and I see only evidence of several databases initializing and some expected user actions and parameters. I really see no evidence AT ALL of unauthorized intrusion attempts, aka database hacking. If there is any more evidence I would be glad to look into it and give my 2 cents' worth.

24/02/2017

Tricks With Hackers
There are many ways in which spammers can get your email address. The ones I know of are :
1. From posts to UseNet with your email address.
Spammers regularily scan UseNet for email address, using ready made programs designed to do so. Some programs just look at articles headers which contain email address (From:, Reply-To:, etc), while other programs check the articles' bodies, starting with programs that look at signatures, through programs that take everything that contain a '@' character and attempt to demunge munged email addresses.
There have been reports of spammers demunging email addresses on occasions, ranging from demunging a single address for purposes of revenge spamming to automatic methods that try to unmunge email addresses that were munged in some common ways, e.g. remove such strings as 'nospam' from email addresses.
As people who where spammed frequently report that spam frequency to their mailbox dropped sharply after a period in which they did not post to UseNet, as well as evidence to spammers' chase after 'fresh' and 'live' addresses, this technique seems to be the primary source of email addresses for spammers.
2. From mailing lists.
Spammers regularily attempt to get the lists of subscribers to mailing lists [some mail servers will give those upon request],knowing that the email addresses are unmunged and that only a few of the addresses are invalid.
When mail servers are configured to refuse such requests, another trick might be used - spammers might send an email to the mailing list with the headers Return-Receipt-To: or X-Confirm-Reading-To: . Those headers would cause some mail transfer agents and reading programs to send email back to the saying that the email was delivered to / read at a given email address, divulging it to spammers.
A different technique used by spammers is to request a mailing lists server to give him the list of all mailing lists it carries (an option implemented by some mailing list servers for the convenience of legitimate users), and then send the spam to the mailing list's address, leaving the server to do the hard work of forwarding a copy to each subscribed email address.
[I know spammers use this trick from bad experience - some spammer used this trick on the list server of the company for which I work, easily covering most of the employees, including employees working well under a month and whose email addresses would be hard to findin other ways.]
3. From web pages.
Spammers have programs which spider through web pages, looking for email addresses, e.g. email addresses contained in mailto: HTML tags [those you can click on and get a mail window opened]
Some spammers even target their mail based on web pages. I've discovered a web page of mine appeared in Yahoo as some spammer harvested email addresses from each new page appearing in Yahoo and sent me a spam regarding that web page.
A widely used technique to fight this technique is the 'poison' CGI script. The script creates a page with several bogus email addresses and a link to itself. Spammers' software visiting the page would harvest the bogus email addresses and follow up the link, entering an infinite loop polluting their lists with bogus email addresses.
4. From various web and paper forms.
Some sites request various details via forms, e.g. guest books & registrations forms. Spammers can get email addresses from those either because the form becomes available on the world wide web, or because the site sells / gives the emails list to others.
Some companies would sell / give email lists filled in on paper forms, e.g. organizers of conventions would make a list of participants' email addresses, and sell it when it's no longer needed.
Some spammers would actually type E-mail addresses from printed material, e.g. professional directories & conference proceedings.
Domain name registration forms are a favourite as well - addresses are most usually correct and updated, and people read the emails sent to them expecting important messages.
5. Via an Ident daemon.
Many unix computers run a daemon (a program which runs in the background, initiated by the system administrator), intended to allow other computers to identify people who connect to them.
When a person surfs from such a computer connects to a web site or news server, the site or server can connect the person's computer back and ask that daemon's for the person's email address.
Some chat clients on PCs behave similarily, so using IRC can cause an email address to be given out to spammers.
6. From a web browser.
Some sites use various tricks to extract a surfer's email address from the web browser, sometimes without the surfer noticing it. Those techniques include :
a. Making the browser fetch one of the page's images through an anonymous FTP connection to the site.
Some browsers would give the email address the user has configured into the browser as the password for the anonymous FTP account. A surfer not aware of this technique will not notice that the email address has leaked.
b. Using JavaScript to make the browser send an email to a chosen email address with the email address configured into the browser.
Some browsers would allow email to be sent when the mouse passes over some part of a page. Unless the browser is properly configured, no warning will be issued.
c. Using the HTTP_FROM header that browsers send to the server.
Some browsers pass a header with your email address to every web server you visit. To check if your browser simply gives your email address to everybody this way, visit http://www.cs.rochesteredu/u/ferguson/BrowserCheck.cgi
It's worth noting here that when one reads E-mail with a browser (or any mail reader that understands HTML), the reader should be aware of active content (Java applets, Javascript, VB, etc) as well as web bugs.
An E-mail containing HTML may contain a script that upon being read (or even the subject being highlighted) automatically sends E-mail to any E-mail addresses. A good example of this case is the Melissa virus. Such a script could send the spammer not only the reader's E-mail address but all the addresses on the reader's address book.
http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-99-04-Melissa-Macro-Virus.html
A web bugs FAQ by Richard M. Smith can be read at http://www.tiac.net/users/smiths/privacy/
wbfaq.htm
7. From IRC and chat rooms.
Some IRC clients will give a user's email address to anyone who cares to ask it. Many spammers harvest email addresses from IRC, knowing that those are 'live' addresses and send spam to those email addresses.
This method is used beside the annoying IRCbots that send messages interactively to IRC and chat rooms without attempting to recognize who is participating in the first place.
This is another major source of email addresses for spammers, especially as this is one of the first public activities newbies join, making it easy for spammers to harvest 'fresh' addresses of people who might have very little experience dealing with spam.
AOL chat rooms are the most popular of those - according to reports there's a utility that can get the screen names of participants in AOL chat rooms. The utility is reported to be specialized for AOL due to two main reasons - AOL makes the list of the actively participating users' screen names available and AOL users are considered prime targets by spammers due to the reputation of AOL as being the ISP of choice by newbies.
8. From finger daemons.
Some finger daemons are set to be very friendly - a finger query asking for raaz@host will produce list info including login names for all people named Raaz on that host. A query for will produce a list of all currently logged-on users.
Spammers use this information to get extensive users list from hosts, and of active accounts - ones which are 'live' and will read their mail soon enough to be really attractive spam targets.
9. AOL profiles.
Spammers harvest AOL names from user profiles lists, as it allows them to 'target' their mailing lists. Also, AOL has a name being the choice ISP of newbies, who might not know how to recognize scams or know how to handle spam.
10. From domain contact points.
Every domain has one to three contact points - administration, technical, and billing. The contact point includes the email address of the contact person.
As the contact points are freely available, e.g. using the 'whois' command, spammers harvest the email addresses from the contact points for lists of domains (the list of domain is usually made available to the public by the domain registries). This is a tempting methods for spammers, as those email addresses are most usually valid and mail sent to it is being read regularily.
11. By guessing & cleaning.
Some spammers guess email addresses, send a test message (or a real spam) to a list which includes the guessed addresses. Then they wait for either an error message to return by email, indicating that the email address is correct, or for a confirmation. A confirmation could be solicited by inserting non-standard but commonly used mail headers requesting that the delivery system and/or mail client send a confirmation of delivery or reading. No news are, of coures, good news for the spammer.
Specifically, the headers are -
Return-Receipt-To: which causes a delivery confirmation to be sent, and
X-Confirm-Reading-To: which causes a reading confirmation to be sent.
Another method of confirming valid email addresses is sending HTML in the email's body (that is sending a web page as the email's content), and embedding in the HTML an image. Mail clients that decode HTML, e.g. as Outlook and Eudora do in the preview pane, will attempt fetching the image - and some spammers put the recipient's email address in the image's URL, and check the web server's log for the email addresses of recipients who viewed the spam.
So it's good advice to set the mail client to *not* preview rich media emails, which would protect the recipient from both accidently confirming their email addresses to spammers and viruses.
Guessing could be done based on the fact that email addresses are based on people's names, usually in commonly used ways (first.last@dom
ain or an initial of one name followed / preceded by the other )
Also, some email addresses are standard - postmaster is mandated by the RFCs for internet mail. Other common email addresses are postmaster, hostmaster, root [for unix hosts], etc.
12. From white & yellow pages.
There are various sites that serve as white pages, sometimes named people finders web sites. Yellow pages now have an email directory on the web.
Those white/yellow pages contain addresses from various sources, e.g. from UseNet, but sometimes your E-mail address will be registered for you. Example - HotMail will add E-mail addresses to BigFoot by default, making new addresses available to the public.
Spammers go through those directories in order to get email addresses. Most directories prohibit email address harvesting by spammers, but as those databases have a large databases of email addresses + names, it's a tempting target for spammers.
13. By having access to the same computer. .
If a spammer has an access to a computer, he can usually get a list of valid usernames (and therefore email addresses) on that computer.
On unix computers the users file (/etc/passwd) is commonly world readable, and the list of currently logged-in users is listed via the 'who' command.
14. From a previous owner of the email address.
An email address might have been owned by someone else, who disposed of it. This might happen with dialup usernames at ISPs - somebody signs up for an ISP, has his/her email address harvested by spammers, and cancel the account. When somebody else signs up with the same ISP with the same username, spammers already know of it.
Similar things can happen with AOL screen names - somebody uses a screen name, gets tired of it, releases it. Later on somebody else might take the same screen name.
15. Using social engineering.
This method means the spammer uses a hoax to convince peopleinto giving him valid E-mail addresses.
A good example is Richard Douche's "Free CD's" chain letter. The letter promises a free CD for every person to whom the letter is forwarded to as long as it is CC'ed to Richard.
Richard claimed to be associated with Amazon and Music blvd, among other companies, who authorized him to make this offer. Yet hesupplied no references to web pages and used a free E-mail address.
All Richard wanted was to get people to send him valid E-mail addresses in order to build a list of addresses to spam and/or sell.
16. From the address book and emails on other people's computers.
Some viruses & worms spread by emailing themselves to all the email addresses they can find in the email address book. As some people forward jokes and other material by email to their friends, putting their friends' email addresses on either the To: or Cc: fields, rather than the BCc: field, some viruses and warms scan the mail folders for email addresses that are not in the address book, in hope to hit addresses the computer owner's friends' friends, friends' friends' friends, etc.
If it wasn't already done, it's just a matter of time before such malware will not only spam copies of itself, but also send the extracted list of email addresses to it's creator.
As invisible email addresses can't be harvested, it's good advice to have the email addresesses of recipients of jokes & the like on BCc:, and if forwarded from somebody else remove from the email's body all the email addresses inserted by the previous sender.
17. Buying lists from others.
This one covers two types of trades. The first type consists of buying a list of email addresses (often on CD) that were harvested via other methods, e.g. someone harvesting email addresses from UseNet and sells the list either to a company that wishes to advertise via email (sometimes passing off the list as that of people who opted-in for emailed advertisements) or to others who resell the list.
The second type consists of a company who got the email addresses legitimately (e.g. a magazine that asks subscribers for their email in order to keep in touch over the Internet) and sells the list for the extra income. This extends to selling of email addresses acompany got via other means, e.g. people who just emailed the companywith inquiries in any context.
The third type consist of technical staff selling the email address for money to spammers. There was a news story about an AOL employee who sold AOL email addresses to a spammer.
18. By hacking into sites.
I've heard rumours that sites that supply free email addresses were hacked in order to get the list of email addresses, somewhatlike e-commerce sites being hacked to get a list of credit cards.
If your address was harvested and you get spammed, the following pages could assist you in tracking the spammer down :
1. MindSpring's page explaining how to get an email's headers
http://help.mindspring.com/features/
emailheaders/extended.htm
2. The spam FAQ, maintained by Ken Hollis.
http://digital.net/~gandalf/spamfaq.html
http://www.cs.ruu.nl/wais/html/na-dir/net-abuse-faq/spam-faq.html
3. The Reporting Spam page, an excellent resource.
http://www.ao.net/waytosuccess/
4. Reading Mail headers.
http://www.stopspam.org/email/headers/
headers.html
5. Julian Haight's Spam Cop page.
http://spamcop.net/
6. Chris Hibbert's Junk Mail FAQ.
http://www.fortnet.org/WidowNet/faqs/
junkmail.htm
7. Sam Spade, Spam hunter.
http://samspade.org/
8. Penn's Page of Spam.
http://home.att.net/~penn/spam.htm
9. WD Baseley's Address Munging FAQ
http://members.aol.com/emailfaq/mungfaq.html
10. Fight Spam on the Internet site
http://spam.abuse.net/
11. The Spam Recycling Center
http://www.spamrecycle.com/
12. The Junk Busters Site
http://www.junkbusters.com/
13. The Junk Email site
http://www.junkemail.org/
14. BCP 30: Anti-Spam Recommendations for SMTP MTAs
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/bcp/bcp30.html
15. FYI 28: Netiquette Guidelines
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/fyi/fyi28.html
FYI 35: DON'T SPEW
A Set of Guidelines for Mass Unsolicited Mailings and Postings
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/fyi/fyi35.html
Several sites on the web will help in tracing spam :
1. Pete Bowden's list of traceroute gateways
http://www.missing.com/traceroute.html
To find traceroute gateways in any country, visit here.
http://www.traceroute.org/
2. Allwhois.com gates to whois on any domain world-wide
http://www.allwhois.com/
3. A list of whois servers, collected by Matt Power
ftp://sipb.mit.edu/pub/whois/whois-servers.list
4. Alldomains.com site - links to NICs worldwide.
http://www.alldomains.com/
A similar page can be found at
http://www.forumnett.no/domreg.html
5. The Coalition Against Usolicited Commerical E-mail.
http://www.cauce.org/
The European CAUCE.
http://www.euro.cauce.org/en/index.html
The Coalition Against Unsolicited Bulk Email, Australia.
http://www.caube.org.au/
The Russian Anti-Spam organization.
http://www.antispam.ru/
6. No More Spam - ISP Spam-Blocking Interferes With Business
http://www.byte.com/columns/digitalbiz/1999/
04/0405coombs.html
Legal resources :
1. FTC Consumer Alert - FTC Names Its Dirty Dozen: 12 Scams Most Likely to Arrive Via Bulk email
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/alerts/
doznalrt.htm
2. Report to the Federal Trade Commision of the Ad-Hoc Working Group on Unsolicited Commercial Mail.
http://www.cdt.org/paper/report-federal-trade-commission-ad-hoc-working-group-unsolicited-commercial-email?quicktabs_4=1
3. Pyramid Schemes, Ponzi Schemes, and Related Frauds
http://www.impulse.net/~thebob/Pyramid.html
4. The AOL vs. Cyberpromo case
http://legal.web.aol.com/decisions/dljunk/
cyber.html
Nine New Lawsuits Press Release.
http://legal.web.aol.com/decisions/dljunk/
ninepress.html
5. "Intel scores in email suit", by Jim Hu, CNET
News.com.
http://www.news.com/News/Item/
0,4,29574,00.html?st.ne.ni.lh
6. The John Marshall Law School spam page
http://www.jmls.edu/cyber/index/spam.html
6. First amendment issues related to UBE, by Paul L. Schmehl.
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/spam_law.html
7. U.S. Anti-Spam Laws
http://www.the-dma.org/antispam/
statespamlaws.shtml
8. The UK Data Protection Law
http://www.dataprotection.gov.uk/
9. The Italian Anti-Spam Law
http://www.parlamento.it/parlam/leggi/deleghe/
99185dl.htm
10.The Austrian Telecm Law
http://www.parlament.gv.at/pd/pm/XX/I/
texte/020/I02064_.html
http://www.bmv.gv.at/tk/3telecom/recht/tkg/
inhalt.htm
JOIN Us

24/02/2017

Increase battery life of laptop Easily....
If you have a laptop with Windows 7 installed, you can use the ‘powercfg‘ command . It will display useful information about your laptop’s energy consumption and usage. If you can understand and maintain it correctly then you can extend your Battery life and performance by great amount.
⁂⁂Steps to Increase battery life of laptop⁂⁂
✔ Step 1: Click on the Start Menu and type “ CMD ” in the Start Search bar.
✔ Step 2: The search will start and it will then display an icon of “ CMD ” . simply right-click on it and select Run as administrator.
✔ Step 3: It will open command line, now simply run the command “powercfg -energy” without quotes. (For windows 7 users.)
Windows 8 users can Simply run the command “powercfg /energy” without quotes.
✔Step 4: Now Press “Enter”.
Once you successfully execute this command , Windows will run a complete scan of your system and it will find some ways to improve performance and power efficiency.
The results of this process will be saved to an HTML file, which is commonly present in the “System32” folder of most of the systems.

Address

Iganga Main Highway Near Finca
Iganga

Opening Hours

Monday 09:00 - 17:00
Tuesday 09:00 - 18:01
Wednesday 09:00 - 18:01
Thursday 09:00 - 18:01
Friday 09:00 - 18:01
Saturday 10:00 - 17:01
Sunday 10:00 - 17:01

Telephone

0775609760

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Softec Technologies posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Softec Technologies:

Share