Directio

Directio IT Consulting and Software Development Directio is a global IT services company. It means taking each person as an individual.

We consult, code, test, deploy and manage mainly cloud-based and mobile applications. We provide around the clock support from our offices in Poland, the Philippines, Mexico and the United States. We address the unique challenges businesses face through consulting, developing, and rapidly delivering top-notch tech products. Our goal is to not only tackle today's business hurdles but also prepare our clients for the future by accelerating their digital transformation. We specialize in:
- cloud solutions
- end-to-end software development
- staff augmentation
- ongoing support
- data visualisation

We have extensive experience in serving the FMCG, retail, automotive, SaaS, and IT services sectors.

“We Code Success” is our guiding principle.

“We code success” means we’re not just writing lines of instructions, crafting prompts or closing tickets. We want everyone associated with us - our clients, partners and employees – to be successful. Successful clients recommend our services to other successful clients – the same is true of partners and employees.

“We code success” means focusing on our clients’ needs first. It means making sure we have a solid understanding of the issue before we propose a solution. It means remaining technology neutral as well as being transparent about what our strengths are and what’s possible. It means being receptive to feedback and consistently working to improve our performance. This approach leads to successful clients who remain with us for many years.

“We code success” also means taking excellent care of our consultants. Our people have families, friends, interests and lives beyond work – we try to support them in these areas as much as possible. Great people are a precious resource we try to acquire, nurture and grow over many years. Our low turnover, long tenured staff and consistently high eNPS score is a testament to this approach.

18/08/2026

🤔 Code is getting cheaper to produce. Bad decisions are getting more expensive.

Coding agents can already analyze repositories, modify multiple files, run tests, fix errors, and prepare code for review.

That shifts the bottleneck.
As implementation gets faster, more weight moves to:
▪️defining the right problem
▪️making sound architectural decisions
▪️giving agents the right context
▪️testing and validating the output
▪️knowing what is actually good enough to ship

AI can speed up implementation, but ut it can also help teams implement a bad specification or poor architecture faster.

Faster implementation doesn’t remove engineering constraints. It moves them upstream: into decisions, architecture and validation.

We see this in client projects at Directio as well. The biggest gains come when AI is introduced into a well-designed engineering process, with clear requirements, the right architecture and strong validation.

That’s where faster coding actually translates into faster delivery.

Filipiny przez lata były synonimem call center.Dziś stają się czymś więcej: jednym z najciekawszych rynków specjalistycz...
31/07/2026

Filipiny przez lata były synonimem call center.
Dziś stają się czymś więcej: jednym z najciekawszych rynków specjalistycznych kompetencji technologicznych w Azji.

W 2025 roku filipiński sektor IT-BPM osiągnął 40 mld USD przychodów i zatrudniał około 1,9 mln osób.
Rynek nadal rośnie. AI go nie zatrzymała. Zmieniła jednak to, gdzie powstaje największa wartość.

Jeszcze w 2020 roku usługi voice, głównie contact centers, odpowiadały za 52% przychodów sektora. Dziś ich udział wynosi około 42%.

W tym samym czasie:
▪️ IT services i software development wzrosły z 12% do 17%,
▪️ usługi non-voice z 20% do 25%,
▪️ healthcare information management z 8% do 11%.

To przesunięcie mówi więcej niż kolejny nagłówek o automatyzacji.

AI przejmuje zadania oparte na powtarzalnym schemacie. Rośnie za to zapotrzebowanie na ludzi, którzy potrafią projektować, oceniać, integrować i brać odpowiedzialność za wynik.

Dlatego coraz większe znaczenie mają dziś:
• software engineering i integracje,
• data engineering i analytics,
• cloud computing,
• cybersecurity,
• AI operations i model validation,
• automatyzacja procesów,
• technologie dla finansów i ochrony zdrowia.

IBPAP wskazuje software development, cloud i cybersecurity jako jedne z głównych obszarów dalszego rozwoju filipińskiego sektora.

Zmienia się też profil poszukiwanego specjalisty.
Filipiny nie odchodzą od outsourcingu. Przechodzą od skali do specjalizacji.

Directio jest na miejscu, by budować zespoły tam, gdzie AI nie zastępuje kompetencji, lecz podnosi wymagania wobec nich.

„Zatrudnijmy zespół offshore. Będzie taniej.”To najłatwiejsza część decyzji.▪️Trudniejsze jest odpowiedzenie na pytania:...
11/06/2026

„Zatrudnijmy zespół offshore. Będzie taniej.”
To najłatwiejsza część decyzji.

▪️Trudniejsze jest odpowiedzenie na pytania:
▪️Kto będzie zarządzał zespołem?
▪️Jak wygląda onboarding?
▪️Kto odpowiada za jakość kodu?
▪️Jak zadbać o transfer wiedzy?
▪️Co się stanie, gdy ktoś odejdzie?

Więcej przeczytasz w naszym artykule: https://www.directio.com/pl/blog/body-leasing-it-czy-warto-zatrudniac-programistow-za-granica/?utm_source=sm&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=blogpost&utm_id=phl_pl

Wiele projektów nie ma problemu z kompetencjami, ale z zarządzaniem strukturą współpracy.

Dlatego przed wyborem partnera osffshore warto określić:
▪️kto podejmuje decyzje techniczne,
▪️ jak wygląda komunikacja między zespołami,
▪️ które procesy pozostają po stronie klienta,
▪️ za co odpowiada partner technologiczny,
▪️ jak mierzone będą efekty pracy.

Wtedy lokalizacja zespołu zaczyna mieć znaczenie.
I wtedy warto pomyśleć o Filipinach.

Filipiny oferują dostęp do dużej puli doświadczonych specjalistów IT, wysoką znajomość języka angielskiego i konkurencyjne koszty. Ale o powodzeniu projektu nie decyduje sam kraj, ale sposób organizacji współpracy.

Bo offshore bez struktury to ryzyko.
Offshore z dobrze zaprojektowanym modelem działania to możliwość szybszego skalowania zespołu bez utraty kontroli nad produktem.

02/06/2026

At Directio, we’ve seen how difficult it has become to scale delivery without overloading senior teams.

In many companies, too much depends on a small group of experienced engineers. And sooner or later, that becomes a bottleneck.

That’s one of the reasons why we believe in building mixed delivery models: senior teams in Europe working together with developers in the Philippines.

When structured well, this setup can significantly improve development speed and operational efficiency.

Our senior engineers can stay focused on:

▪️architecture,
▪️technical leadership,
▪️client communication,
▪️solving complex engineering challenges.

While the delivery team supports:

▪️feature development,
▪️maintenance,
▪️fixes,
▪️operational ex*****on.

The result?

Fewer bottlenecks and situations where an entire project depends on a handful of overloaded senior people.

This model works especially well when:

▪️processes are clearly documented,
▪️ownership is well defined,
▪️async communication is part of the culture,
▪️documentation actually exists and is maintained.

But we’ve also learned something important: this model only works when companies invest in strong operational foundations.

In conversations we have at Directio, “tech debt” is one of the most overused and least examined terms.It’s often used a...
28/05/2026

In conversations we have at Directio, “tech debt” is one of the most overused and least examined terms.

It’s often used as a catch-all for very different situations:
▪️ deliberate shortcuts taken to move faster,
▪️improvements that were postponed and never revisited,
▪️engineering decisions that should not have been made that way.

Grouping all of this under one label makes planning easier, but it removes important distinctions.

Once everything is called tech debt, it starts to sound inevitable. As if it simply accumulated over time. In reality, much of it comes from conscious trade-offs made under pressure.

That distinction changes how you approach it:
▪️some debt still makes sense today,
▪️some of it reflects prioritization, not a problem,
▪️some of it points to deeper issues in engineering discipline.

At Directio, the most productive discussions happen when teams separate these categories instead of merging them.

Without that clarity, every decision about “repayment” becomes blurred.
Which part of your tech debt was actually a deliberate choice?

11/05/2026

At Directio, we rarely walk into a system and think this architecture is the real problem.

In most cases, the foundations are solid enough to move forward.

What slows things down is something less visible: how long it takes to make decisions.

We often see the same pattern repeat itself.

A relatively small issue appears, but instead of being resolved, it starts circulating between teams. It gets discussed, reframed, escalated, and waits for alignment that never fully comes. By the time a decision is made, the situation has already evolved.

What usually sits behind this:
▪️unclear ownership of decisions,
▪️too many stakeholders involved too early,
▪️a need for consensus in places where accountability is required.

Over time, hesitation becomes part of how the system operates.
Adding more governance tends to reinforce the problem rather than solve it.

What actually changes the dynamic is more direct:
▪️clear ownership,
▪️defined decision boundaries,
▪️fewer people involved at the moment of choice.

Architecture gives you room to move. Decision latency quietly takes that away.

Most companies treat offshoring in the Philippines as a cost move.That’s the first mistake.Costs don’t fix unclear roles...
26/03/2026

Most companies treat offshoring in the Philippines as a cost move.
That’s the first mistake.
Costs don’t fix unclear roles, weak processes, or poor communication.
They amplify them.

What actually determines if it works:
▪️start with the problem, not hiring
▪️define ownership and KPIs upfront
▪️design communication (tools, cadence, rules)
▪️treat onboarding as a structured process

Without this, the team stays disconnected from the business.

Why the Philippines:
▪️large, skilled talent pool
▪️strong English communication
▪️service-oriented culture
▪️time overlap with Europe + extended coverage

But talent alone won’t solve ex*****on.

Many companies start with staff augmentation to test the setup - and only then scale into a dedicated team.

We broke down how to do it step by step (and where most teams fail).
Link: https://www.directio.com/blog/dedicated-offshore-teams-from-philippines-a-practical-guide-for-european-companies/?utm_source=sm&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=blogpost&utm_id=phl

06/03/2026

Most job descriptions for cloud developers read like a shopping list:
AWS, Kubernetes, Terraform, Serverless, Five programming languages, Ten certifications.

None of that tells you whether someone will actually build a system that survives real production.

A great cloud developer is not defined by the number of services they know.
They are defined by how they think about systems.

▪️ First, they understand failure.
Cloud platforms create the illusion that infrastructure problems disappeared.
In reality, the problems just moved one level up. Networking limits, misconfigured IAM, cascading retries, cost explosions. A strong cloud developer designs systems assuming something will break.

▪️Second, they understand cost as an architectural constraint.
In many organizations the cloud bill becomes a surprise only after the system scales. A mature developer knows that every architectural decision has a price curve attached to it.

▪️Third, they care about operability.
Many systems look clean in architecture diagrams and become a nightmare to debug in production. Good cloud developers think about logs, metrics, tracing, and incident response before the first major outage happens.

▪️And finally, they are skeptical of complexity.
Just because the cloud makes something possible does not mean it should be built. The best cloud developers remove components more often than they add them.

Knowing the tools matters.
But understanding the consequences of using them matters far more.

Most cloud data breaches are not infrastructure failures.They stem from access decisions and configuration gaps in Publi...
26/02/2026

Most cloud data breaches are not infrastructure failures.

They stem from access decisions and configuration gaps in Public cloud.
Cloud computing increased deployment speed and the impact of mistakes. One exposed cloud resource can make sensitive data publicly accessible within minutes.

Across data breaches in cloud computing, the same factors appear:
▪️excessive IAM permissions
▪️public storage enabled
▪️encryption not enforced
▪️ monitoring not reviewed
▪️unmanaged third-party access
These are governance issues, not platform defects.

The article outlines:
▪️ why cloud data breaches are operational failures
▪️how to prevent data breaches in the cloud through enforceable controls
▪️how cloud security applications reduce data breaches when tied to response
▪️which cloud data breach statistics matter for leadership

Full article:
https://bit.ly/3OEbE5E

12/02/2026

In 2024, Europe adopted the world’s first comprehensive AI regulation.
In 2026, it starts reshaping how cloud environments are designed.

The impact is already visible.

European Enterprises are reviewing provider exposure to the USA, reassessing data sovereignty requirements, and reconsidering long-term dependency on hyperscale cloud service providers.

At the same time, Cloud AI workloads are driving infrastructure costs higher. Sovereign cloud investment is accelerating. Multicloud and hybrid models are becoming structural elements of architecture.

At Directio, we see this shift across industries. Cloud conversations have moved beyond migration. They now focus on resilience, governance, cost discipline, and strategic autonomy.

In our latest article, we explore:
▪️how the EU AI Act and Data Act influence cloud architecture
▪️ why sovereign cloud adoption is accelerating
▪️how cloud cost optimisation and selective cloud repatriation shape decision-making
▪️what IT leaders should prioritize in 2026

The insights are based on market analysis and Directio’s hands-on experience supporting cloud transformation programs across Europe.

If cloud strategy is on your agenda for 2026, this perspective may help structure the discussion.

Link in the comments.

Pokaż tłumaczenie

Adres

Sienna 39
Warsaw
00-121

Godziny otwarcia

Poniedziałek 09:00 - 17:00
Wtorek 09:00 - 17:00
Środa 09:00 - 17:00
Czwartek 09:00 - 17:00
Piątek 09:00 - 17:00

Telefon

+48722003322

Strona internetowa

Powiadomienia

Bądź na bieżąco: wyślemy Ci e-mail, gdy Directio opublikuje nowości i promocje. Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie wykorzystany do żadnego innego celu, a subskrypcję możesz anulować w dowolnym momencie.

Kontakt: Firmę

Wyślij wiadomość do Directio:

Skróty

Udostępnij

Kategoria