22/05/2026
A large part of the new software implementation plan is choosing the right implementation type, as there is no singular, universal "right". Making a good choice requires striking the right balance between time, risk and cost, and different types help you achieve just that.
The most common options include:
▪️Direct implementation (Big Bang): Involves switching the entire organisation to the new software and at the same time discontinuing the old system - all processes immediately operate in the new environment. In our three-attribute rating system, it would be the fastest and cheapest, but also the most risky.
▪️Parallel implementation: Assumes the simultaneous use of both the new and old systems for a certain period. Data is entered and compared in both environments, allowing the organisation to gradually build trust in the new solution. It's the most secure type, but the costs might be piling up if the parallel system's uptime is prolonged.
▪️Phased implementation: Involves gradually launching the system, for example, module by module or department by department. Each stage is tested and stabilised before moving on to the next one. This method offers a lower risk and an opportunity to optimise costs and implementation time, gradually improving the process.
▪️Pilot implementation: Involves deploying the system on a limited scale, for example, within one team, branch, or process. Only after successful testing is the solution rolled out across the entire organisation. Pilot lets your organisation evaluate attributes on a smaller scale and helps you make the best choice.
You can learn more about software implementation strategy in the article:
https://www.finanteq.com/blog-posts/how-to-successfully-implement-new-software
What is your solution for choosing the right implementation type? Let us know in the comments 👇
