Seo Elitetech

03/04/2014

Google’s Matt Cutts: We Can Improve Our Algorithms For Authorities On Topics

http://searchengineland.com/googles-matt-cutts-can-improve-algorithms-authorities-topics-188277

In an interesting video released by Matt Cutts, Google’s head of webspam, Matt answers the question on how Google separates the concept of popularity from authority. The truth is, he answered that question quickly by saying popularity and authority are two different things. The example he gave was t...

28/03/2014

This is a must read article- It talks about what to expect once Link penalty has been removed.

You can call us @ +91-9818231202 if you are struggling to revive from Manual Link penalty. We will help you recover.

http://moz.com/blog/after-penalty-removed-will-traffic-increase

Have you had a manual unnatural links penalty removed? Have you done a thorough Penguin link cleanup? Here's what you can expect to see in regards to traffic once your site is no longer penalized.

28/03/2014

Google's Matt Cutts: Be Careful Linking Sister Country Sites Together When...

Matt addressed a pretty straight forward question we've touched on here a few times about how to inform Google of multiple ccTLDs for your business.

The real answer is to use a href lang and that is the best approach.
But Matt gets into linking between your ccTLDs. Here are some points on that:

(1) It is okay to link to all your ccTLDs but don't over do it in the footer.

(2) At max link to only 4 or 5 ccTLDs in your footer

(3) It's best to set up a country landing page and link to them that way on that page.

Now, where it is not okay or you should be considered about linking country sites together is when you are not going the ccTLD approach. So if you have bluewidgetsincanada.com and bluewidgetsinsweden.com and bluewidgetsinaustralia.com and so on. When you go that approach, Matt says be careful and probably do not link to all of them like that.

28/03/2014

Did Google Do An Algorithm Update Yesterday?

We've been noticing a steady and consistent level of chatter in the forums and social networks from webmasters and SEOs around Google's search results fluctuations. The steady an consistent level of chatter is actually higher than the typical, but it is steady and consistently asking if there was shifts.

As you know, Google has been active on manual actions recently around a lot of link networks, so I first suspected the chatter and reactions were around sites being impacted by that. It still may be but it seems the chatter has slightly increased over the past day or so.