11/06/2017
One extract from upcoming bookЁЯСЗЁЯСЗЁЯСЗ
One SSB aspirants asked me the response of a SRT when on Sunday I met some defense aspirants of NCC.I told him to give me his response first and then I would tell my response to that SRT.The SRT wasЁЯСЗЁЯШБ
1) He was crossing a river in a small boat, suddenly the boat developed a small hole.
SSB CRACK рд╡рд╛рд▓реЗ рднреИрдпрд╛ ka responseЁЯШБЁЯШБ-ЁЯСЙ he would continue in the boat till it was safe, then he would jump down from the boat and start swimming to reach the bank.
(You can refer it in example set no. 2 first SRT in book Let's crack -SSB by SSB crack)
My view on thisЁЯСЖЁЯШБ
SSB crack рд╡рд╛рд▓реЗ рдЕрдВрдХрд▓,I don't know who is the writer behind your book but whoever has written such a response must have first learnt some terms and conditions of SRTs.You have written the book for the defense aspirants and if someone copy these responses of your SRTs which no doubt many SSB aspirants do,if they will respond like this in future tense...then those SRTs responses are completely wrong without even concerning what matter has been written.
рдлрд┐рд░ рдХреНрдпрд╛ рд▓рд┐рдЦрд╛ рдЖрдкрдиреЗ рдлрд░реНрдХ рди рдкреЬрддрд╛, рдХреИрд╕реЗ рд▓рд┐рдЦрдирд╛ рд╣реИ рдпреЗ рд╕реАрдЦрдирд╛ рдЪрд╛рд╣рд┐рдП рдкрд╣рд▓реЗредредред
For eg. рдХрд┐рд╕реА рд▓реЬрдХреА рдХреЛ I love you рдордд рдмреЛрд▓реЛ рдлрд░реНрд╕реНрдЯ love рдХрд░рдирд╛ рд╕реАрдЦреЛ..(рдЕрдм рдпреЗ рдордд рдХрд╣рдирд╛ love рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рднреА рддреЛ рд▓реЬрдХреА рдЪрд╛рд╣рд┐рдП рднреИрдпрд╛ рдШрд░рд╡рд╛рд▓реЛрдВ рдХреЛ рдХрд░ рд▓реЛ рдкрд╣рд▓реЗ рдФрд░ рджреЛрд╕реНрддреЛрдВ рдХреЛредред)
Keeping Jokes apart, my dear SSB aspirants,you need to write the responses of SRTs in Simple past tense and I will justify my point with logic.There will be many logics that you will read in my upcoming book. First when you say "I will" its an incomplete starting itself because we all know that future is uncertain..there is no confirmation that you would do it or not. If you write in past tense it means you have done or fully completed that task. Its not necessary that рд╡реЛ рдЖрдкрдХреЗ рд╕рд╛рде рд╣реБрд╡рд╛ рд╣реЛрдЧрд╛, its just a situation- рдЕрдЧрд░ рд╣реБрд╡рд╛ рд╣реЛрддрд╛ рдЖрдк рдХреНрдпрд╛ рдХрд░рддреЗредред It isn't actually happening and you need to do it isn't the motto.
SRT responses are not best or worst but they can be partially wrong or right.You have to write some practical reasons or justified by some logics.Point is some qualities will automatically emerge from your responses.Don't try to forcefully write the qualities.
In this above SRT, its not even partially right because you know the objective- is to cross the river and obstacle is the small hole in your boat by which water is coming inside.
My dear friends,without cutting or blocking the obstacle how can you reach to the destination??
You can't surpass the situation,you have to face it and if water is coming in your boat then the first practical thing you will do is to block the hole and go towards the bank.One example is рдЖрдкрдХреЛ рдХреЛрдИ рд▓реЬрдХреА рдЕрдЪреНрдЫреА рд▓рдЧрддреА рд╣реИ рдФрд░ рдЖрдк рдЙрд╕рдХреЛ kiss рдХрд░рдирд╛ рдЪрд╛рд╣рддреЗ рд╣реЛредред So what will you do? Its just simple.. You just propose that girl and then their is the chance that kiss will happen. Same thing is here too- you want to cross the river and hole is there,so you block the hole then your boat will help you to cross the river.Its not like that you will go and grab the girl and kiss her ,you better know then what the result will be рдФрд░ рдХрд┐рддрдирд╛ рдХрд┐рд╕реНрд╡рд╛ рдХрд░ рд▓реЛрдЧреЗ рднреИрдпрд╛ ЁЯШБ
So same thing apply in this SRT as well.Without blocking the hole, moving yourself towatds the bank is useless.рдХрд┐рддрдирд╛ рдЪрд▓реЗ рдЬрд╛рдУрдЧреЗ рднреИрдпрд╛!!
So its better to block and go smoothly.
Moreover if Interviewing officer asks this SRT- then he will block your answer in many ways to counter your response without any logics because he want you to tell him some logics.!
One more viewЁЯСЗ
SSB wants that when you respond,you should bring out some qualities in your response.So here in SSB crack responses, the quality which emerged is half courage and not even full courage..full рд╣реЛрддрд╛ рддреЛ you would have faced that situation but you are escaping from there.
Escaping type personality is рдЬрд┐рд╕рдХреА рдлрдЯ рдЬрд╛рддреА рд╣реИ рдХреБрдЫ рдореБрд╢реНрдХрд┐рд▓ рдЖрдиреЗ рдкрд░, рдФрд░ рдХреНрдпрд╛ рдлрдЯ рдЬрд╛рддреА рд╣реИ, you better know itЁЯШЭЁЯШЭ
If you will write this wayЁЯСЗ
Response- first thing should be spontaneous response, you blocked hole, (by cloth, foot or any available resources (you can write it or not upto you just giving you example here)
ЁЯСЙ Blocked hole, carried boat to bank, reached and got it repaired.
SeeЁЯСЖЁЯСЖЁЯШБ its as simple as tha and ypu can easily see the difference in selection of words.If you write lengthy responses you won't be able to complete 60 SRTs and you know it that the more you do more benefit you have (provided they are quality based) and qualities which emerge out in this SRT is effective intelligence, reasoning ability, organizing ability, speed of decision making, liveliness and last but not the least courage too..
So my point is by a single SRT you can project your many OLQs. So my dear SSB aspirants,I will not ask you not to read these kind of books !! Its your choice.I would like to say if you read them then read some retired officers book at least and not of those civilians who don't know anything and write book.
Its just one example of one SRT that I got from that book.Same I saw with WAT and TAT too were wrong!! рд╡реИрд╕реЗ its not about right or wrong answers, its about whether you have a write approach or not with basic ideas of rules.. I just want to suggest you that dont read answers of others, just know the rules and make it your own way or your own some practical approach. just LIT your LIGHT yourself that's my point..!.(continue in upcoming book )
Writer- AWAKEN The SUCCESS Within YOU...++