10/09/2026
The fastest way to cut costs in 2026, apparently, is to put an AI chatbot between you and your customers. We've decided not to.
Our support team has been in-house for 25 years. When a customer calls with a server problem - sometimes at odd hours, always worried - a person from our team answers. That was true in 2001, and it's true today.
We do use AI in support now, quite heavily. We've just pointed it in the other direction: it helps our engineers instead of replacing them. It finds similar past incidents in seconds, summarises long ticket histories, and drafts responses that a human reviews and owns. The engineer is still there - just faster, better informed, and less exhausted.
Why go this way when the industry is going the other? Because we've watched this pattern before. In the 2000s, every business suddenly wanted a website - we know, because we were building and hosting them. Few could say why. In the 2010s it was mobile apps; companies spent lakhs on apps nobody downloaded. Now it's AI's turn, and the same question is being skipped: what problem are we solving?
For us, support was never about closing tickets. It's about a worried customer feeling that someone competent has taken ownership. Every use of AI that serves that, we adopt. Every use that puts distance between us and the customer, we decline.
When your business is down at 2am, do you really want to negotiate with a bot?
As a customer - when you contact any company's support, what do you actually hope happens in the first two minutes?
- Hriday Biyani, Founder, Diadem Technologies