23/08/2026
Five partners in one consortium, and every one of them sends translations in a different format. The communication officer ends up checking files manually before anything can go out.
This repeats at every reporting period. Not because the translations are bad, but because nobody agreed on a workflow before the project started.
What actually works: one input format, a shared terminology base, and a clear process for who approves the final version. Set this up at month one, not at the first deadline.
AI supports translation and production. Human editorial review covers project terminology, public claims, and anything that goes to the Commission or donors.
If your consortium is heading into the next reporting period with the same manual process — write to us. We set up multilingual content systems for Erasmus+ and Horizon Europe projects.
📩 [email protected]