What are the opening hours?

Monday 9am - 7pm Tuesday 9am - 7pm Wednesday 9am - 7pm Thursday 9am - 7pm Friday 9am - 7pm

Cloud4U, 14 Gray's Inn Road, London Colney (2026)

01/06/2026

An open-source infrastructure tool removes the licensing risk introduced when Terraform moved to the BSL
In 2023, HashiCorp moved Terraform from the open MPL 2.0 to the restrictive Business Source License.

The community responded with a fork - OpenTofu, now a Linux Foundation project under MPL 2.0.

For a business, this is about predictability and control, not ideology.

OpenTofu is a drop-in replacement for Terraform: same HCL, providers and state format, so migration is mechanical.

Infrastructure described as code deploys identically across every environment, and changes go through review like any other code - reducing manual errors and speeding up recovery.

Talk to us about managing your infrastructure through IaC: https://www.cloud4u.com/cloud-hosting/cloud-server/?utm_source=fbeng&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=010626

27/05/2026

Three signals that your workload should move from public cloud back to colocation

Public cloud bills compute, storage, requests and egress as separate line items, and for a predictable 24/7 workload those micro-charges add up faster than the initial estimate suggests.

Moving back to owned hardware is justified by economics, not ideology - and the signals are concrete.

1️⃣ Sustained utilisation.

If your load runs above 70% around the clock, owned hardware in colocation reaches parity with cloud in roughly a year and is cheaper after that, thanks to flat fixed costs.

2️⃣ Specific hardware needs.

GPU density, custom configurations, direct control over firmware and storage topology - things public cloud offers at a premium or not at all.

3️⃣ Long usage horizon.

Over 3–5 years, hardware amortisation and fixed colocation rates protect the budget against rising cloud pricing.

Count the full TCO honestly: cross-connects, remote hands and setup push the first invoice well above the rack rate. For variable and bursty workloads, cloud stays cheaper.

Cloud4U provides private cloud and helps model the TCO:

https://www.cloud4u.com/private-cloud/?utm_source=fbeng&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=270526

22/05/2026

For engineering leaders: choosing a dev tools stack for a new team in 2026

According to Atlassian: Data Center prices rose 15-40% on Feb 17, 2026 (source: Atlassian); new licences stopped on Mar 30, 2026; read-only mode arrives Mar 28, 2029.

Replacing the GitHub + Jira + Confluence default is no longer a preference question - it has a budget date attached to it.

The choice between hosted and self-hosted alternatives comes down to three trade-offs.

1️⃣ Self-hosting vs SaaS.

Self-hosted (Gitea, Forgejo, GitLab CE, OpenProject, BookStack, Wiki.js) gives data control and predictable costs but adds operations effort. SaaS shifts that burden but moves data outside your perimeter.

2️⃣ License model.

Open-source (GPL, MIT, AGPL) - zero licence cost, full modification rights. Freemium (YouTrack: free up to 10 users, then $5/user/month) catches up to proprietary SaaS as teams grow.

3️⃣ Hiring.

Gitea and Forgejo mirror GitHub's UX with Actions-compatible CI - onboarding takes days. GitLab CE delivers full DevSecOps but needs dedicated DevOps. OpenProject and Redmine have steeper learning curves.

Cloud4U provides cloud servers and private cloud capacity for self-hosted dev stacks:

https://www.cloud4u.com/private-cloud/?utm_source=fbeng&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=220526

15/05/2026

Default Kubernetes manifests pass "it runs", not production.

Seven manifest parameters that determine cluster behaviour under real load:

1️⃣ Resource requests and limits - without them, a memory leak takes down a node.

2️⃣ livenessProbe - restarts a pod whose process is alive but unresponsive.

3️⃣ readinessProbe - adds a pod to the Service only when actually ready to serve traffic.

4️⃣ PodDisruptionBudget - cap on simultaneous voluntary evictions during drains or upgrades.

5️⃣ topologySpreadConstraints - spreads replicas across nodes and failure zones.

6️⃣ securityContext with the restricted Pod Security Standards profile - no root, read-only filesystem - protection against escalation if a container is compromised.

7️⃣ NetworkPolicy - explicit traffic rules between pods instead of the default "any-to-any".

These seven parameters are the minimum baseline. Their absence shows up at the first non-routine event: traffic spike, upgrade, node failure.

Cloud4Y operates managed Kubernetes clusters - control plane, upgrades and monitoring on the provider side. The team focuses on workload manifests and the parameters above:

https://www.cloud4u.com/cloud-services/kubernetes-as-a-service/?utm_source=fbeng&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=150526

08/05/2026

Not every GPU workload requires an H200.

Match the GPU class to the actual workload - the right metric is cost per unit of work, not "newer = better".

Three signals that an RTX 4090 or Tesla V100/P100 is enough:

1️⃣ model size - up to 24B for inference, up to 7B for fine-tuning. Fits into 16–32 GB without sharding;

2️⃣ workload - development, experimentation, inference for a small audience, no strict latency or throughput requirements;

3️⃣ budget priority - hourly rate matters: consumer GPUs and workhorse vGPUs sit in the lower tier, while H200 and B200 sit at the top.

When Blackwell is the only option:

▪️ 70B+ models in FP4/FP8 with long context. B200 delivers high LLM throughput per GPU vs Hopper, with 180 GB HBM3e for KV cache headroom.

A hybrid position - RTX 6000 Blackwell (96 GB ECC). A workstation-form-factor GPU that runs a 70B model in FP8 on a single accelerator.

Cloud4U provides the full GPU range - RTX 4090, Tesla V100/P100, NVIDIA H200, B200 and RTX 6000 Blackwell - with hourly billing and no CAPEX commitment → https://www.cloud4u.com/cloud-hosting/gpu/?utm_source=fbeng&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=080526

04/05/2026

For engineering leaders: which self-hosted Git platform fits which scenario when migrating off GitHub Actions

When teams move off managed cloud CI, the choice between self-hosted Git platforms is driven by the working scenario, not product comparisons. Two situations - two practical solutions with different trade-offs.

1️⃣ Minimal operational overhead, fastest path off the SaaS. Gitea is a sensible choice here - around 52,000 stars on GitHub, lightweight install, deploys on a standard Linux server in under an hour.

Decisive advantage for teams migrating from GitHub Actions: Gitea Actions are compatible with GitHub Actions workflows - around 20,000 Marketplace actions are reusable inside Gitea, pipelines port across with minimal rewriting.

Trade-off: open-core model since 2022 - some features behind a paid tier.

2️⃣ Long-term independence and a copyleft license matter. Forgejo is worth considering - a hard fork of Gitea since February 2024 under the non-profit Codeberg e.V. GPL v3+ from v9.0.

Stronger emphasis on end-to-end testing, ActivityPub federation in development. Trade-off: smaller community than Gitea, Windows no longer supported as a deployment target since 2024.

Cloud4Y provides the infrastructure for both scenarios:

https://www.cloud4u.com/cloud-services/kubernetes-as-a-service/?utm_source=fbeng&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=040526

29/04/2026

5 infrastructure checks before the team steps away for a few days

Infrastructure doesn't take time off when the team does. Whether it's a team offsite, a training week, or a set of public holidays, a short pre-absence checklist costs nothing to run through - and helps everyone come back to a system in the same state they left it.

1️⃣ Monitoring and alerts. Critical metrics covered, thresholds sane, notifications going to the right channels - not the general team chat where no one will see them on a Saturday.

2️⃣ Backups. Most recent successful backup is today. Job log checked, no silent failures. This is the day to verify - not the first day back.

3️⃣ On-call. The engineer on rotation knows they are on rotation. Calendar, contacts, access - all current. Second-level escalation covered too.

4️⃣ Risky changes deferred. Releases, migrations, OS upgrades right before a multi-day absence are almost never a good idea. Let them wait.

5️⃣ Provider support contacts accessible. Phone, chat, email - somewhere the on-call engineer can reach quickly. Not only on the work laptop.

A system nobody has to think about over a quiet week is the whole point.

https://www.cloud4u.com/?utm_source=fbeng&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=290426

27/04/2026

Backup datacenter vs DRaaS: the 6 cost categories usually left out of the 5-year calculation

The decision to build a backup datacenter is often made on CAPEX - servers, storage, network, UPS. That part is transparent.

But on a 5-year horizon, CAPEX typically accounts for only 20-30% of total cost of ownership. The remaining 70-80% is operational - and that's where the overlooked line items live.

Six categories routinely missing from the initial calculation:

1️⃣ 24/7 staffing for the secondary site.

Not one sysadmin - a minimum of 3-4 FTEs for continuous coverage. At typical enterprise DevOps loaded costs, this alone often exceeds the initial CAPEX over five years.

2️⃣ Hardware refresh cycle.

Servers and storage require replacement every 5-7 years. In the 5-year window, this is a recurring CAPEX, not a one-time expense.

3️⃣ PUE (Power Usage Effectiveness) differential.

Corporate backup sites typically run at PUE 1.6-1.8; hyperscale-class facilities reach 1.1-1.2. The difference flows directly into the electricity bill.

4️⃣ Regular DR testing.

Formal drills consume engineer-days several times a year.

5️⃣ Compliance audits for both sites separately.

PCI DSS, ISO 27001 - the second site does not inherit the first site's attestation.

6️⃣ Inter-site network redundancy.

Redundant links, their regular testing, and full-failover capacity reservation.

With these six accounted for, the 5-year TCO of an owned backup facility runs roughly 3-4x higher than a comparable DRaaS subscription at equivalent RTO and RPO.

https://www.cloud4u.com/cloud-hosting/disaster-recovery/?utm_source=fbeng&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=270426

23/04/2026

LLM infrastructure economics: three scenarios and what drives the choice

The choice between self-hosted GPU, cloud GPU rental, and API access to an external model is fundamentally a choice between two different approaches: external API (using someone else's model) and local LLM (running your own model, with two hosting options).

This is a TCO and data sovereignty decision - not just a cost-per-token calculation.

1️⃣ API provider - fastest start, minutes to deploy. OpenAI API pricing (2026): GPT-4o-mini at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input / output tokens; GPT-4o at $2.50 / $10.00 per million.

At ~50K tokens per hour of active specialist use, this translates to roughly $0.02–0.30 per hour depending on the model tier (OpenAI pricing, 2026). High provider dependency: pricing, availability, and model terms can change without notice.

2️⃣ Cloud GPU rental - data stays in your jurisdiction, deployment in hours to days.

Market rate for A100 80GB in major cloud providers: ~$1.29–$2.50 per GPU-hour on specialty providers (Jarvis Labs, RunPod, Lambda - March 2026), or roughly $1,000–$1,800 per month for 24/7 use.

Hyperscalers (AWS, GCP, Azure) run ~$3.40/GPU-hour.

Enables fine-tuning on proprietary data. Optimal when load is predictable and data residency matters.

3️⃣ Self-hosted cluster - full control, minimal latency, no vendor dependency. Requires significant CapEx.

GPU hardware in the H100/A100 class is subject to US export restrictions in certain jurisdictions, which can affect procurement timelines and pricing.

API is the right start. Cloud GPU is the right scale. Self-hosted is the right answer when you have sustained load and a mature ML team.

Cloud4Y GPU servers for ML and LLM inference:

https://www.cloud4u.com/cloud-hosting/gpu/?utm_source=fbeng&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=230426

17/04/2026

PCI DSS 4.0: How architecture reduces compliance costs

PCI DSS compliance cost is determined by audit scope - the number of systems subject to assessment - not by transaction volume.

A smaller cardholder data environment (CDE) means fewer controls to implement, fewer systems to monitor, and a shorter, less expensive audit.

Three architectural approaches with direct cost impact:

1️⃣ Tokenisation replaces card numbers (PANs) with valueless tokens. Systems that only handle tokens - CRM, analytics, order management - fall outside scope entirely.

Well-executed tokenisation combined with segmentation reduces audit effort by 40–70%.

2️⃣ Hosted payment pages (via certified providers such as Stripe, Braintree, or Adyen) mean cardholders enter data directly with the provider.

The PAN never touches your infrastructure, making a simplified Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ A) achievable rather than a full QSA audit.

3️⃣ Network segmentation isolates the CDE in a dedicated segment via firewalls and VLANs. Only that segment falls under PCI DSS requirements.

Each approach reduces not only audit cost but attack surface - a direct business case, not a compliance checkbox.

Cloud4Y provides PCI DSS-certified hosting with dedicated, segmented infrastructure for cardholder data environments:

https://www.cloud4u.com/cloud-hosting/pci-dss-hosting/?utm_source=fbeng&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=170426

Cloud4U

01/06/2026

27/05/2026

22/05/2026

15/05/2026

08/05/2026

04/05/2026

29/04/2026

27/04/2026

23/04/2026

17/04/2026

Address

Opening Hours

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Monday	9am - 7pm
Tuesday	9am - 7pm
Wednesday	9am - 7pm
Thursday	9am - 7pm
Friday	9am - 7pm