12/10/2026
Can nuclear energy be judged by evidence rather than fear?
This article challenges the assumption that even tiny radiation exposures are necessarily dangerous, arguing that precautionary policies and public fears may sometimes cause more harm than they prevent. It makes the case for reassessing nuclear-energy regulation in light of evidence—and for having a more informed debate about nuclear power’s role.
An argument worth examining: where should caution end and evidence begin?
Professor Wade Alison of Oxford thinks so.
https://thethorium.network/confidence-in-nuclear-energy-the-acceptance-of-evidence-should-replace-traditional-caution/