25/02/2026
If you are moving your business to the cloud, you’ve likely heard that you should spread your data across AWS, Google, and Microsoft. It sounds like a great "insurance policy," but for most businesses, it’s a complexity trap.
Here is why we usually recommend a simpler approach:
💸 Hidden Costs
Managing three clouds means triple the setup and three different security models. We’d rather see your budget go toward new features, not extra infrastructure overhead.
🚀 Speed Issues
Moving data between different clouds isn't free or instant. If your app and database are on different providers, you will face lag and high "data transfer" bills.
🛡️ The Lock-in Myth
Modern providers are incredibly reliable. For 99% of businesses, the risk of a major cloud failing is much lower than the risk of a complex, multi-cloud setup breaking because it’s too hard to manage.
⚖️ When it actually works
We only recommend it for specific cases, like legal requirements for a certain country or needing a niche tool that only one provider offers. In those cases, we build a specific bridge between them.
Our goal is to keep your tech scalable without draining your budget. A well-built setup on one reliable provider is usually the fastest way to grow.
Thinking about splitting your cloud setup? Let’s look at your specific needs and find the path that actually saves you money. 🤝
