09/08/2026
WE ARE LIVE
1,800+ candidates have been part of the ecosystem we've been building around talent.
And after seeing so many people go through interviews, something started bothering me.
Are we really getting to know someone's actual ability in a 45-minute interview?
I've personally seen highly experienced engineers—with 5, 8, even 10+ years of experience and strong backgrounds—struggle during interviews.
Not because they couldn't do the job.
Sometimes they simply couldn't perform under the pressure of that particular moment.
And I've seen the opposite too.
People who are extremely good at interviews, but don't necessarily translate that performance into the workplace.
As someone who has spent a lot of time around hiring and technology, I couldn't stop thinking about this.
Maybe the problem isn't always the candidate.
Maybe the format itself needs to evolve.
That was the thought that started everything.
We began exploring what an interview could look like if candidates had access to the same kind of AI assistance they're increasingly using in their everyday engineering work.
It wasn't a weekend project.
We spent months researching, experimenting, testing real interview scenarios, coding questions, system-design discussions and actual conversations.
We broke things.
We fixed them.
We tested again.
And eventually, that work became **TruelyCrack — an AI Assistant Copilot for interviews.
It's not another interview preparation platform.
It's not another question bank.
**It's built for the moment when the interview is actually happening.**
Today, we're ready to put it in the hands of real people.
And honestly, I'm more interested in hearing what you think than telling you what to think.
If you've ever taken a technical interview, what is ONE thing you believe is fundamentally broken about the process?
Tell me.
We've spent months building a solution.
Now I'd like to hear from the people we're building it for. 👇
