10/19/2026
G7 countries are planning cybersecurity exercises to simulate AI-enabled attacks against financial systems.
We think that's a worthwhile development.
Most organizations have incident-response plans, escalation procedures, and recovery documentation. But having those procedures written down doesn't tell you how well they'll work during an actual crisis, which is why exercises are valuable.
They expose assumptions, communication gaps, unclear responsibilities, and dependencies that may have been overlooked.
From an audit perspective, we'd want to see how organizations follow through on what these exercises uncover.
Were the weaknesses documented? Were corrective actions assigned? And did anyone verify that the problems were actually fixed?