O&K ICT Consultants

O&K ICT Consultants Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from O&K ICT Consultants, Computer Company, Boroko, NCD, Port Moresby.

🌐 **Got Starlink? Turn It Into Income!**If you already have Starlink at home, in the village, at a rental compound, or i...
27/05/2026

🌐 **Got Starlink? Turn It Into Income!**

If you already have Starlink at home, in the village, at a rental compound, or in your suburb, you may be able to turn it into a small income stream by sharing affordable WiFi access with your community.

With the right setup, you can sell WiFi vouchers for short sessions, daily passes, or weekly access. Your neighbours get affordable internet, and you recover your monthly Starlink cost — with the potential to earn extra on the side.

✅ 30 mins — K2
✅ 2 hours — K5
✅ Day Pass — K15
✅ Weekly — K50

This is perfect for villages, settlement areas, rental compounds, and neighbourhoods where mobile data is expensive and internet access is limited.

O&K ICT Consultants can help you set up the right router, voucher system, user management, and basic tracking so you can run it properly from your phone or laptop.

📞 Interested? Message us today or call **70652953**.

**O&K ICT Consultants**
Helping communities connect — one WiFi voucher at a time.

SpaceX Files to Go PublicInside Elon Musk’s $28 trillion bet on space, satellites, and artificial intelligence21 May 202...
21/05/2026

SpaceX Files to Go Public

Inside Elon Musk’s $28 trillion bet on space, satellites, and artificial intelligence
21 May 2026

After more than two decades as one of the most valuable private companies in the world, Space Exploration Technologies Corp. has finally filed the paperwork to take itself public. The S-1 registration statement, lodged with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on 20 May 2026, lays out — in 277 pages of dense legal prose, financial tables, and engineering ambition — exactly what investors will be buying into if they purchase shares under the proposed Nasdaq ticker SPCX.

And what they will be buying is no longer just a rocket company.
A company in three parts

The SpaceX of 2026 operates across three distinct businesses, each large enough to be a major listed company in its own right.

The Space segment is the original business and the part most people still associate with the brand. It includes the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy rockets, the Dragon crew capsule, and the still-developing Starship — the fully reusable super heavy-lift vehicle on which much of the company’s long-term strategy depends. Since 2023, SpaceX has launched more than 80% of the world’s mass to orbit each year, with a mission success rate above 99% across roughly 650 orbital launches.

The Connectivity segment is Starlink: about 9,600 satellites in Low-Earth Orbit serving roughly 10.3 million subscribers across 164 countries and territories, including Papua New Guinea. A separate satellite-to-mobile constellation of around 650 V1 Mobile satellites now provides direct-to-phone messaging and voice services in about 30 countries. This is the part of SpaceX that actually makes money — and a lot of it.

The AI segment is the newest, and the most controversial. In February 2026, SpaceX absorbed xAI, Musk’s artificial intelligence company, which had itself swallowed X (formerly Twitter) the year before. With one stroke, SpaceX inherited the Grok large language model, the X social platform, the COLOSSUS and COLOSSUS II gigawatt-scale data centres in Memphis and Mississippi, and a combined user base of roughly 1.3 billion accounts.

The money picture
The financial portrait that emerges from the filing is striking, and not entirely flattering.

For the first quarter of 2026, SpaceX reported revenue of US$4.69 billion against an operating loss of US$1.94 billion. For the full year 2025, revenue was US$18.67 billion and the operating loss was US$2.59 billion. The company is, in other words, a very large business that is currently losing very large sums of money.

Look beneath the headline figures, however, and the picture sharpens. Starlink is enormously profitable. The Connectivity segment generated US$11.4 billion in revenue and US$4.4 billion in operating income in 2025, with year-on-year growth of nearly 50%.

The Space segment roughly breaks even, because every spare dollar is being poured into developing Starship. The AI segment, meanwhile, lost US$6.35 billion on US$3.2 billion in revenue last year — a deliberate consequence of the company’s decision to spend heavily on data centres and model training.

Capital expenditure in 2025 alone exceeded US$20 billion. Of that, roughly US$12.7 billion went into AI infrastructure. In the first quarter of 2026, AI capex was US$7.7 billion — more than the entire Space and Connectivity capex combined.

The message to prospective investors is clear: SpaceX is no longer primarily a launch business that happens to run a satellite network. It is becoming a compute and infrastructure company that happens to own the world’s best rockets.

Musk’s grip on the company
Anyone buying SPCX shares should understand one thing clearly: they will not be buying control. They will not even be buying meaningful influence.

The company will list with a dual-class share structure. Class A shares — the ones offered to the public — carry one vote each. Class B shares, which Musk holds, carry ten votes each. The holders of Class B shares are also entitled to elect a majority of the board of directors. The combined effect is that Musk will personally control the outcome of virtually every shareholder vote and the composition of the board, regardless of how many Class A shares are sold.

SpaceX will be classified as a “controlled company” under Nasdaq rules, an exemption that allows it to avoid certain corporate governance requirements that normally apply to listed firms, including the requirement to have a majority-independent board and independent compensation and nominating committees. The prospectus is admirably blunt about this. Mr Musk, it states, “will have the power to control the outcome of matters requiring shareholder approval.”

Investors who are comfortable with founder-led companies will not be troubled by this. Those who prefer the protections of standard corporate governance will need to weigh the trade-off carefully.

The vision being sold
The strategic argument that runs through the entire prospectus is, in essence, this: artificial intelligence is going to require staggering amounts of electricity, and Earth’s power grids cannot keep up. Between 2008 and 2023, U.S. electricity generation grew at a compound annual rate of just 0.1%. AI data centre demand, meanwhile, is exploding. Something has to give.
SpaceX’s answer is to move the data centres into space. The Sun, the filing notes, contains roughly 99.8% of the energy in our solar system, and space-based solar arrays can generate more than five times the energy per unit area of equivalent terrestrial installations.

The company proposes to build constellations of AI compute satellites in Sun-synchronous orbit, powered by solar arrays, cooled by radiating heat directly into the vacuum of space, and connected back to Earth via the existing Starlink network. It plans to begin deployment as early as 2028.

The total addressable market the company quotes is US$28.5 trillion. Of that, US$26.5 trillion is in AI — a number that includes US$22.7 trillion in enterprise applications, US$2.4 trillion in AI infrastructure, US$760 billion in consumer subscriptions, and US$600 billion in digital advertising. Whether one accepts that figure or not, it is a useful indicator of the scale of ambition.
Beyond orbital data centres, the filing also discusses lunar mass drivers, asteroid mining, in-orbit manufacturing, point-to-point terrestrial travel by rocket, energy production on the Moon and Mars, and what the company calls “digital human augmentation.” These are listed as “Future Markets,” with the candid acknowledgment that several of them “do not exist today.”

Notable deals
Three transactions disclosed in the recent developments section are worth flagging.

First, in May 2026, SpaceX signed cloud services agreements with Anthropic, the AI safety company, under which Anthropic will pay SpaceX US$1.25 billion per month through May 2029 for access to compute capacity on the COLOSSUS clusters. That is a US$45 billion contract over three years, with 90-day termination provisions on either side. It also confirms that SpaceX intends to operate as a compute provider to third parties, not just to its own AI models.

Second, SpaceX has an option to acquire Cursor, the AI coding company, at an implied equity value of US$60 billion. The option is structured so that if SpaceX walks away, Cursor receives a US$1.5 billion termination fee and an US$8.5 billion deferred services fee. If exercised, the acquisition would be paid for in SpaceX Class A shares.

Third, the company is in the process of acquiring spectrum licences from EchoStar covering the AWS-3, AWS-4, and H-Block bands — a transaction approved by the FCC on 12 May 2026 but still subject to closing conditions. Combined with the Terafab chip manufacturing collaboration with Tesla and Intel announced earlier this year, the picture is of a company aggressively vertically integrating across every layer of the AI stack: chips, compute, connectivity, models, and applications.

The risks, in the company’s own words
Every S-1 carries a Risk Factors section, and SpaceX’s runs from page 26 to page 64. The risks the company itself flags are worth taking seriously.

Starship is not yet operational at scale. The company has completed eleven flight tests and expects commercial payload delivery in the second half of 2026. Most of the growth strategy — orbital compute, next-generation satellites, lunar missions — depends on Starship working as advertised.

Regulatory dependencies are deep. Launch licences from the FAA, spectrum authorisations from the FCC, and equivalent approvals in every country Starlink operates in are all ongoing requirements with no guarantees of renewal.

The AI business is described in the filing as “recently formed, still being integrated… subject to integration, ex*****on, competitive and operational risks.”

Several core initiatives — orbital AI compute, lunar economy, Mars transport, human augmentation — “involve significant technical complexity, unproven technologies, or technologies that do not exist.”

The company carries substantial debt. The SpaceX Credit Facility was amended and expanded in May 2026, and a new bridge loan was put in place in March.

What it means
SpaceX is, by almost any measure, one of the most consequential private companies of the early twenty-first century. It has fundamentally reshaped the economics of access to space, brought broadband internet to communities that no fibre or cellular network was ever going to reach, and is now positioning itself to become one of the dominant providers of artificial intelligence infrastructure on the planet — and, potentially, off it.

It is also a company that loses billions of dollars a quarter, depends on technologies that do not yet exist for much of its long-term thesis, is controlled absolutely by a single founder whose attention is famously divided across multiple ventures, and is asking the public to fund the next phase of an extraordinarily ambitious expansion.

The S-1 makes no attempt to disguise any of this. It is, in fact, unusually candid about the speculative nature of much of the growth story. Whether that candour is reassuring or alarming will depend largely on the investor.

The pricing details — share price, total shares offered, exact percentage of voting power retained by Musk — are still blank in the preliminary prospectus. Those will be filled in closer to the IPO date. When they are, the market will deliver its own verdict on whether the world’s most ambitious company is also a sensible investment.

Source: Space Exploration Technologies Corp., Form S-1 Registration Statement, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 20 May 2026.

🇵🇬 PNG's AI Policy: A Good Start — But Is It Enough?The Government recently released its draft AI framework for public s...
10/03/2026

🇵🇬 PNG's AI Policy: A Good Start — But Is It Enough?

The Government recently released its draft AI framework for public services. I read it carefully. Here's my view.

First, credit where it's due.
This document is readable. It's written in plain language. It clearly tells citizens what Government will and won't use AI for. It says no secret citizen scoring. No AI-only decisions on your rights or benefits. No misuse of PNG cultural heritage.

Those are important promises and I'm glad they're in writing.
The architecture — building shared digital foundations first, then layering AI on top — is also the right approach. Think of it like building a house: you pour the foundation before you put on the roof. That logic is sound.

But i have concerns too.
This document is Part 1 of a two-part framework. Part 1 is the Citizen Guide — the public-facing document about trust and principles. Part 2 is the Government Implementation Pack — the operational detail, the standards, the rollout plans.

Part 2 is not yet public.
And that matters. Because without Part 2, we cannot answer the questions that actually determine whether this framework delivers anything real:

📌 Which services will be improved first, and by when?
📌 Which agency is accountable if something goes wrong?
📌 What are the actual targets — faster processing by how much? Fraud/Corruption detected at what rate?
📌 How will PNG build local AI capability so we're not permanently dependent on foreign systems?
📌 How exactly will PNG cultural heritage and our 800+ languages be protected — not just in principle, but in practice?

A policy without numbers is a wish. A commitment without a deadline is a suggestion.

The human review question — and why it cuts both ways.
The framework says AI will never make final decisions on your rights, benefits, or penalties alone. A human must always be involved. (HITL - Human In the Loop)

On the surface, that sounds protective. And for a first framework, it's the right starting position.

But here's the uncomfortable truth we also need to name: in many parts of our public service, the human in that loop is also the source of the delay, the inconsistency, and yes the corruption.

AI will only fix our system if we're honest about what's actually broken — and design around it, not just on top of it.

On sovereignty — and why it requires more than a policy statement.

The framework talks about protecting PNG's digital sovereignty — not allowing foreign AI systems to control our core government decisions. I support that principle completely.

But sovereignty requires engineers. It requires data scientists. It requires local technical capacity. A policy statement alone cannot make PNG sovereign in AI. We need a talent pipeline — UPNG partnerships, scholarships, diaspora recall, local developer ecosystems. That plan needs to be visible and funded.

My overall assessment:
Part 1 of this framework does its job. It builds public trust. It sets clear boundaries. It explains the vision in language ordinary Papua New Guineans can understand. That is not nothing — in fact, for a first public AI document, it's better than most.

But Part 1 by itself is not enough to prove PNG can deliver.
The real test is Part 2. When it is released, the questions we should all be asking are:

✅ Are there real targets with real deadlines?
✅ Are there named institutions with real accountability?
✅ Is there a pilot — one province, one service, proven before national rollout?
✅ Is there a genuine cultural heritage protection mechanism — not just a complaints pathway, but a consent and governance process built with community language custodians?
✅ Is there a talent and capability plan?

If Part 2 answers yes to those questions — this framework is genuinely credible and PNG should be proud of it.

If Part 2 is as general as Part 1 — then the hard questions need to be asked loudly, by citizens, by civil society, and by Parliament.
PNG deserves AI that works for us — not just AI that sounds good on paper.

I'll be watching Part 2 closely. I encourage everyone else to do the same.

10/03/2026

Is data entry killing you? Getting reports from provinces or districts and spending hours updating an excel sheet? AI can help you

10/03/2026

Want to start a side hustle building websites? Let me show you how to use AI to do that

10/03/2026

Did I say you need to learn Claude AI? You need to learn Claude AI if you are a PNG Professional

Are you an administrator or sector manager at the sub-national level? If you are curious about AI and how it can help yo...
10/03/2026

Are you an administrator or sector manager at the sub-national level? If you are curious about AI and how it can help your team — we can help. 🇵🇬

At O&K ICT Consultants, we work with provincial, district, and local-level government officers across PNG to show them how to use AI tools in their everyday work.

This is not about complicated technology. It is about saving time on the reports, briefs, and documents that take up most of your week — and producing better work faster.

Here is what our training covers:
✅ Using AI to draft progress reports and situation reports
✅ Turning raw notes into formatted ministerial briefs
✅ Producing MTDP-aligned summaries from your own data
✅ Setting up AI to know your role, your department, and your writing style

We deliver training online and in-person, tailored to the PNG Public Service context.

🎁 FREE OFFER — 3-Day Claude Cowork Course
We have put together a free 3-day beginner's course built specifically for PNG government officers. By the end, you will have an AI teammate on your laptop that drafts your reports, briefs, and correspondence — ready to send.

To get it for free, simply send us a WhatsApp message to 70652953 and we will send it straight to you.

📲 WhatsApp: 7065 2953
🌐 https://okictai.github.io/boroko/

Used AI to rebuild the following websitesWater PNG and CPA PNG (Certified Practicing Accountants), which one should I tr...
08/03/2026

Used AI to rebuild the following websites

Water PNG and CPA PNG (Certified Practicing Accountants), which one should I try next? All done in 30 minutes using pure AI (no code)

https://cpapng-revamp.vercel.app/

https://waterpng-revamp.vercel.app

Water PNG Limited — Papua New Guinea's leading provider of safe, clean water and sanitation services. Serving communities across the nation.

Tried a little project tonight, i used AI to scrape the WaterPNG website and rebuilt it this is what it came up with aft...
07/03/2026

Tried a little project tonight, i used AI to scrape the WaterPNG website and rebuilt it

this is what it came up with after an hour or so (the official Water PNG website is linked in the comments on this post (compare the 2)

A redesigned Water PNG experience focused on billing, outages, service updates, and customer support.

06/03/2026

We finally have our website up

1-on-1 AI coaching for professionals in Papua New Guinea. Book a free consultation today.

Address

Boroko, NCD
Port Moresby
111

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when O&K ICT Consultants posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to O&K ICT Consultants:

Shortcuts

Share